United States v. Fox

Second Circuit

United States v. Fox

257 F.2d 805, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4555

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 30, 1958

DocketNo. 312, Docket 24856

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 257 F.2d 805 (United States v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Fox, 257 F.2d 805, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4555 (2d Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal brought by the owners of property condemned by the Government challenges the adequacy and basis for the award of compensation made after trial in the District Court without a jury.

There is no claim of error in the reception or exclusion of evidence. Two valuation witnesses testified for the owners and one for the Government.¹ The trial judge personally viewed the property and the surrounding neighborhood. In a well considered opinion filed after trial the court found just compensation payable to appellants in the sum of $59,-450. There is substantial evidence to support his findings and conclusions and they should not be modified or disturbed (Phillips v. United States, 2 Cir., 1945, 148 F.2d 714).

Affirmed.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal brought by the owners of property condemned by the Government challenges the adequacy and basis for the award of compensation made after trial in the District Court without a jury.

There is no claim of error in the reception or exclusion of evidence. Two valuation witnesses testified for the owners and one for the Government.¹ The trial judge personally viewed the property and the surrounding neighborhood. In a well considered opinion filed after trial the court found just compensation payable to appellants in the sum of $59,-450. There is substantial evidence to support his findings and conclusions and they should not be modified or disturbed (Phillips v. United States, 2 Cir., 1945, 148 F.2d 714).

Affirmed.-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 F.2d 805, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fox-ca2-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack