United States v. Fowlkes

484 F. App'x 842
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 11, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6981
StatusPublished

This text of 484 F. App'x 842 (United States v. Fowlkes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fowlkes, 484 F. App'x 842 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sean Darnell Fowlkes appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for reconsideration and to alter or amend the denial of his request for grand jury materials. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States, 360 U.S. 395, 399-400, 79 S.Ct. 1237, 3 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1959); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 800 F.2d 1293, 1298-99 (4th Cir.1986). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States
360 U.S. 395 (Supreme Court, 1959)
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Gj-76-4 & Gj-75-3
800 F.2d 1293 (Fourth Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
484 F. App'x 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fowlkes-ca4-2012.