United States v. Foust
This text of 20 C.M.A. 256 (United States v. Foust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
Failure of the appellant to place in writing his request to be tried by military judge alone renders invalid that proceeding as well as a subsequent rehearing on sentence, also heard by military judge alone, where a second request was reduced to writing. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970). Accordingly, the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review is reversed. The findings of guilty and sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. Another trial may be ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 C.M.A. 256, 20 USCMA 256, 1971 CMA LEXIS 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-foust-cma-1971.