United States v. Foster

127 F. App'x 853
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Foster. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 F. App'x 41
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 14, 2005·No. 04-1273·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Diruby Thomas Foster pleaded guilty below to being a felon in possession of a firearm. His plea agreement waived all appellate rights, except with regard to whether the evidence against him, which the district court refused to suppress, was the fruit of an illegal search and seizure. After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case, Fed. R.App. P. 34(a), and that the district court’s refusal to suppress the evidence was based on a credibility finding that was not clearly erroneous. We therefore affirm the conviction.

*854 We also deny Poster’s motion to remand for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, —U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738,160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because Foster waived his right to raise this issue on appeal. See United States v. Bradley, 400 F.3d 459, 465-66, 2005 U.S.App. LEXIS 3970, at *18-*19 (6th Cir.2005) (dismissing Booker claim because defendant’s plea agreement waived right to appeal).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Foster, 127 F. App'x 853 (6th Cir. 2005).

127 F. App'x 853 (United States v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Samuel Demont Bradley
400 F.3d 459 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)