United States v. Foster
196 F. App'x 42
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Foster. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 F. App'x 537 →
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Foster claims his sentence is unreasonable. We assume familiarity with the facts, the procedural history, and the issues on appeal.
1. Foster challenges the imposition of two upward departures. Because this Court has already upheld the imposition of these departures in this case, see United States v. Foster, 127 Fed.Appx. 537, 540 (2d Cir.2005), this challenge is foreclosed.
2. When reviewing the substantive reasonableness of a sentence, an appellate court considers “whether the length of the sentence is reasonable in light of the factors outlined in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).” United States v. Rattoballi, 452 F.3d 127, 132 (2d Cir.2006). In light of these factors, Foster’s sentence is reasonable.
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Foster, 196 F. App'x 42 (2d Cir. 2006).
196 F. App'x 42 (United States v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. James Rattoballi
452 F.3d 127 (Second Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Foster
127 F. App'x 537 (Second Circuit, 2005)