United States v. Forrester

76 M.J. 444, 2017 WL 4004258
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Forrester. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 M.J. 479
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided August 1, 2017·No. No. 17-0049/MC·Published

Opinion

CCA 201600295

DAILY JOURNAL

Notice—In Re October 2017 Term of Court

Article 142 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 942 (2012), authorizes the appointment of five judges to serve on the Court. One of the positions is vacant. Unless the Court issues a notice that a senior judge or an Article III judge will perform judicial duties, the four judges in active service will perform the functions of the Court. See Articles 142 and 144, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 942 and 944, and U.S.C.AA.F. Rule 6(a).

NOTICES

In view of the existence of a vacant position on the Court, notice is hereby given that the Chief Judge has called upon Senior Judge Charles B. Erdmann to perform judicial duties in the above-referenced case, and that Senior Judge Erdmann has consented to perform judicial duties in said case under Article 142(e)(Z )(A)(ii), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 942(e)(Z )(A)(ii) (2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Forrester, 76 M.J. 444, 2017 WL 4004258 (Ark. 2017).

76 M.J. 444 (United States v. Forrester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Art. 142. Judges
10 U.S.C. § 942
§ 944
10 U.S.C. § 944