United States v. Forrestal

237 F.2d 914
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedOctober 30, 1956
DocketNo. 11733
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 237 F.2d 914 (United States v. Forrestal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Forrestal, 237 F.2d 914 (7th Cir. 1956).

Opinion

LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus. At the time of rendition of the district court’s decision, petitioner was in the custody of the U. S. Navy awaiting a court martial trial. During the pendency of this appeal, petitioner was tried by court martial and sentenced to eighteen months at hard labor and a dishonorable discharge. However, upon review, this, sentence was reduced to a bad conduct discharge and petitioner released from custody. As petitioner is no longer detained in custody, the cause is moot. Weber v. Squier, 315 U.S. 810, 62 S.Ct. 800, 86 L.Ed. 1209; Hawley v. United States, 10 Cir., 194 F.2d 52; United States v. Dixon, 8 Cir., 199 F.2d 753; Siercovich v. McDonald, 5 Cir., 193 F.2d 118; Murray v. Wedemeyer, 9 Cir., 179 F.2d 963; Factor v. Fox, 6 Cir., 175 F.2d 626; Bledsoe v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 164 F.2d 481; U. S. Code, Title 28, § 2241.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 F.2d 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-forrestal-ca7-1956.