United States v. Forrestal

237 F.2d 914
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided October 30, 1956·No. No. 11733·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus. At the time of rendition of the district court’s decision, petitioner was in the custody of the U. S. Navy awaiting a court martial trial. During the pendency of this appeal, petitioner was tried by court martial and sentenced to eighteen months at hard labor and a dishonorable discharge. However, upon review, this, sentence was reduced to a bad conduct discharge and petitioner released from custody. As petitioner is no longer detained in custody, the cause is moot. Weber v. Squier, 315 U.S. 810, 62 S.Ct. 800, 86 L.Ed. 1209; Hawley v. United States, 10 Cir., 194 F.2d 52; United States v. Dixon, 8 Cir., 199 F.2d 753; Siercovich v. McDonald, 5 Cir., 193 F.2d 118; Murray v. Wedemeyer, 9 Cir., 179 F.2d 963; Factor v. Fox, 6 Cir., 175 F.2d 626; Bledsoe v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 164 F.2d 481; U. S. Code, Title 28, § 2241.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Forrestal, 237 F.2d 914 (7th Cir. 1956).

237 F.2d 914 (United States v. Forrestal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related