United States v. Forest Geffert

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 15, 2020·No. 19-10558·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 19-10558 Document: 00515382852 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/15/2020

CORRECTED April 15, 2020

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 19-10558 FILED Conference Calendar January 30, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FOREST GEFFERT, also known as Diamond,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:18-CR-6-27

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The opinion issued March 24, 2020, is withdrawn by the panel, and the following is issued in its place: The attorney appointed to represent Forrest Geffert has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (p1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 19-10558 Document: 00515382852 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/15/2020

No. 19-10558

Geffert has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Forest Geffert, (5th Cir. 2020).

United States v. Forest Geffert (United States v. Forest Geffert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)