United States v. Ford

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ford

64 F. App'x 401

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 2, 2003·No. 02-7613·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Camille Ford appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to reopen her previous § 2255 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ford, Nos. CR-94-163; CA-98-1206 (E.D.Va. Sept. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Camille Ford appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to reopen her previous § 2255 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ford, Nos. CR-94-163; CA-98-1206 (E.D.Va. Sept. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Ford, 64 F. App'x 401 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

64 F. App'x 401 (United States v. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.