United States v. Ford

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 27, 2003
Docket02-7943
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Ford (United States v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ford, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7943

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KENNETH PIERRE FORD, a/k/a K-9,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-429-A)

Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 27, 2003

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Pierre Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Chestnut, Jerry R. DeMaio, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Pierre Ford appeals from the district court’s order

denying his request for an order directing the Bureau of Prisons to

permit Ford and his co-defendant to serve their sentences at the

same facility. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See United States v. Ford, No. CR-91-429-A (E.D.

Va. Nov. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Ford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ford-ca4-2003.