United States v. Foley

372 F. App'x 492
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2010·No. No. 09-20184·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Ray Foley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Foley has filed a response and moves for the appointment of counsel. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Foley’s response discloses no nonfrivo-lous issue for appeal. Foley’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Cf. United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998) Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Foley, 372 F. App'x 492 (5th Cir. 2010).

372 F. App'x 492 (United States v. Foley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Wagner
158 F.3d 901 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)