United States v. Flores-Diaz

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Flores-Diaz

411 F.2d 1224

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 29, 1969

DocketNos. 23430, 23431

StatusPublished

This text of 411 F.2d 1224 (United States v. Flores-Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Flores-Diaz, 411 F.2d 1224 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction of the appellant Francisco Aros-Gonzales is affirmed.

The judgment of conviction of the appellant Benito Flores-Diaz is reversed by reason of the insufficiency of the evidence to show knowledge on his part, either by direct evidence or presumptively, of the existence of marijuana hidden in the automobile; the matter is remanded with instructions to dismiss as to him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction of the appellant Francisco Aros-Gonzales is affirmed.

The judgment of conviction of the appellant Benito Flores-Diaz is reversed by reason of the insufficiency of the evidence to show knowledge on his part, either by direct evidence or presumptively, of the existence of marijuana hidden in the automobile; the matter is remanded with instructions to dismiss as to him.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

411 F.2d 1224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-flores-diaz-ca9-1969.