United States v. Flores-Curiel
This text of 552 F. App'x 693 (United States v. Flores-Curiel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Antonio Flores-Curiel does not qualify for expungement of his 1992 conviction under the Federal First Offender Act (FFOA), 18 U.S.C. § 3607. He concedes that he was not sentenced under § 3607(a) and that he was over 21 at the time of the offense. Thus, he does not meet the FFOA’s conditions for expungement. See United, States v. Crowell, 374 F.3d 790, 792 (9th Cir.2004).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
552 F. App'x 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-flores-curiel-ca9-2014.