United States v. Flores
This text of United States v. Flores (United States v. Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-41044 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
HECTOR GARZA FLORES,
Defendant-Appellant.
______________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-00-CR-20-1 ______________________________________ May 8, 2001 Before POLITZ, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Hector Garza Flores appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction of distributing cocaine. Flores contends that the district court clearly
erred in calculating the quantity of cocaine attributable to him for sentencing
purposes.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Our review of the record and briefs on appeal persuades us that the district court’s drug quantity calculation is not erroneous. The finding that Flores
distributed at least 400 grams of cocaine is amply supported by testimony elicited at
the sentencing hearing.1 We find no basis for rejecting the trial court’s findings or its computation and imposition of sentence.
AFFIRMED
1 United States v. Davis, 76 F.3d 82 (5th Cir. 1996). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Flores, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-flores-ca5-2001.