United States v. Florentino Magana-Lua
Opinion
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Florentino MAGANA-LUA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 89-10178.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 11, 1989.*
Decided Dec. 27, 1989.
Before POOLE, REINHARDT and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
After considering all the arguments in Magana-Lua's brief and after drawing all reasonable inferences, we conclude that the district court imposed a proper sentence.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
892 F.2d 84 (United States v. Florentino Magana-Lua) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.