United States v. Florentino Magana-Lua
This text of 892 F.2d 84 (United States v. Florentino Magana-Lua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Florentino MAGANA-LUA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 89-10178.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 11, 1989.*
Decided Dec. 27, 1989.
Before POOLE, REINHARDT and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
After considering all the arguments in Magana-Lua's brief and after drawing all reasonable inferences, we conclude that the district court imposed a proper sentence.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
892 F.2d 84, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 19436, 1989 WL 155909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-florentino-magana-lua-ca9-1989.