United States v. Florencio Rosales-Mireles
This text of United States v. Florencio Rosales-Mireles (United States v. Florencio Rosales-Mireles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 16-50151 Document: 00514594435 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/10/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 16-50151 FILED __________ August 10, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff−Appellee,
versus
FLORENCIO ROSALES-MIRELES, Also Known as Roberto Lozano-Alcauter,
Defendant−Appellant.
_______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas _______________________
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Florencio Rosales-Mireles pleaded guilty of illegal reentry into the United States and was convicted and sentenced. The sentence was based in part on unobjected-to error. On appeal, this court declined to exercise Case: 16-50151 Document: 00514594435 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/10/2018
No. 16-50151
discretion to afford plain-error relief and affirmed. United States v. Rosales- Mireles, 850 F.3d 246 (5th Cir. 2017). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded. Rosales-Mireles v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1897 (2018).
On remand, the United States and the Federal Public Defender filed a joint motion to vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. Although we are not bound even by a joint motion, we agree that the request is appropriate. The motion is GRANTED. The judgment of sentence is VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Florencio Rosales-Mireles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-florencio-rosales-mireles-ca5-2018.