United States v. Florencio Rosales-Mireles

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Florencio Rosales-Mireles. Read the opinion of the Court — 850 F.3d 246
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 10, 2018·No. 16-50151·Published

Opinion

Case: 16-50151 Document: 00514594435 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/10/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 16-50151 FILED __________ August 10, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

FLORENCIO ROSALES-MIRELES, Also Known as Roberto Lozano-Alcauter,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Florencio Rosales-Mireles pleaded guilty of illegal reentry into the United States and was convicted and sentenced. The sentence was based in part on unobjected-to error. On appeal, this court declined to exercise

Case: 16-50151 Document: 00514594435 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/10/2018

No. 16-50151

discretion to afford plain-error relief and affirmed. United States v. Rosales- Mireles, 850 F.3d 246 (5th Cir. 2017). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded. Rosales-Mireles v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1897 (2018).

On remand, the United States and the Federal Public Defender filed a joint motion to vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. Although we are not bound even by a joint motion, we agree that the request is appropriate. The motion is GRANTED. The judgment of sentence is VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Florencio Rosales-Mireles, (5th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Florencio Rosales-Mireles (United States v. Florencio Rosales-Mireles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Florencio Rosales-Mireles
850 F.3d 246 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
Rosales-Mireles v. United States
585 U.S. 129 (Supreme Court, 2018)