United States v. Florence White Eagle

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Florence White Eagle. Read the opinion of the Court — 721 F.3d 1108
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 12, 2013·No. 11-30352·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-30352 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:11-cr-00032- SEH-1 FLORENCE A. WHITE EAGLE, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER

Filed November 12, 2013

Before: Kenneth F. Ripple*, M. Margaret McKeown, and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed July 5, 2013, 721 F.3d 1108, is amended as follows:

At page 15 of the slip opinion, line 1; 721 F.3d 1108, 1116, “on or around” shall be changed to “on or about”.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has

* The Honorable Kenneth F. Ripple, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation. 2 UNITED STATES V. WHITE EAGLE

requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for en banc or panel rehearing shall be permitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Florence White Eagle, (9th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Florence White Eagle (United States v. Florence White Eagle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Florence White Eagle
721 F.3d 1108 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)