United States v. Fletcher

653 F. App'x 783
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 31, 2016
DocketNo. 15-4699
StatusPublished

This text of 653 F. App'x 783 (United States v. Fletcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fletcher, 653 F. App'x 783 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Teresa Lyn Fletcher appeals the district court’s order denying Fletcher’s self-styled “Motion for Judicial Review of Forfeiture Order,” which Fletcher filed pro se in her criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Fletcher, No. 5:14— cr-00120-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
653 F. App'x 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fletcher-ca4-2016.