United States v. Fletcher

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Fletcher

653 F. App'x 783

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 31, 2016·No. No. 15-4699·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Teresa Lyn Fletcher appeals the district court’s order denying Fletcher’s self-styled “Motion for Judicial Review of Forfeiture Order,” which Fletcher filed pro se in her criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Fletcher, No. 5:14— cr-00120-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Teresa Lyn Fletcher appeals the district court’s order denying Fletcher’s self-styled “Motion for Judicial Review of Forfeiture Order,” which Fletcher filed pro se in her criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Fletcher, No. 5:14— cr-00120-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Fletcher, 653 F. App'x 783 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

653 F. App'x 783 (United States v. Fletcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.