United States v. Flesher
73 M.J. 90, 2013 CAAF LEXIS 1242
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedOctober 31, 2013
DocketNo. 13-0602/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 73 M.J. 90 (United States v. Flesher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Flesher, 73 M.J. 90, 2013 CAAF LEXIS 1242 (Ark. 2013).
Opinion
CCA 20110449. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE ADMITTED THE TESTIMONY OF A PUTATIVE EXPERT [91]*91WITNESS IN VIOLATION OF THE MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE AND CASE LAW ON BOLSTERING, EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS, RELEVANCE, AND THE APPROPRIATE CONTENT AND SCOPE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
73 M.J. 90, 2013 CAAF LEXIS 1242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-flesher-armfor-2013.