United States v. Fleming
This text of 146 F. App'x 232 (United States v. Fleming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Edward Fleming was convicted of attempting to smuggle four undocumented aliens to Guam in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(i). While the evidence that he was smuggling aliens is overwhelming, Fleming argues the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of specific intent to smuggle to a non-designated port. The statute makes it a crime to attempt to assist an alien to enter the United States “at a place other than a designated port of entry.” Id.
The evidence was overwhelming that Fleming was trying to smuggle aliens. The evidence of intent to enter a non-designated port was easily sufficient, if not overwhelming. None of the aliens had entry permits for Guam. The alien passengers had agreed to pay thousands of dollars to get to Guam from the CNMI. There was no evidence to support any inference that defendant intended to bring the aliens to a designated port of entry.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 F. App'x 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fleming-ca9-2005.