United States v. Flannery

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Flannery

106 F.2d 315, 23 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 357, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2990

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 1939·No. Nos. 4487, 4488·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Careful consideration of the questions involved in these cases convinces us that the decisions below were correct for reasons adequately stated in the opinions of the District Judge. Flannery v. United States, 25 F.Supp. 677; Spaid v. United States, 28 F.Supp. 670. As nothing could be added by further discussion of the questions, in the decision of which the lower court followed decisions of the Second Circuit (Helvering v. Archbald, 70 F.2d 720, Helvering v. Walbridge, 70 F.2d 683), the opinions of the District Judge are adopted as the opinions of this Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Careful consideration of the questions involved in these cases convinces us that the decisions below were correct for reasons adequately stated in the opinions of the District Judge. Flannery v. United States, 25 F.Supp. 677; Spaid v. United States, 28 F.Supp. 670. As nothing could be added by further discussion of the questions, in the decision of which the lower court followed decisions of the Second Circuit (Helvering v. Archbald, 70 F.2d 720, Helvering v. Walbridge, 70 F.2d 683), the opinions of the District Judge are adopted as the opinions of this Court.

Affirmed.

United States v. Flannery, 106 F.2d 315, 23 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 357, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2990 (4th Cir. 1939).

Pincite

106 F.2d 315 (United States v. Flannery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related