United States v. Flanagan

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Flanagan

177 F. App'x 966

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 1, 2006·No. No. 05-16443; D.C. Docket No. 05-00030-MC-17-TGW·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tracy Dreispul, appointed counsel for Michael S. Flanagan in his direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from fur[967] ther representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Flanagan’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Tracy Dreispul, appointed counsel for Michael S. Flanagan in his direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from fur[967] ther representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Flanagan’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Flanagan, 177 F. App'x 966 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

177 F. App'x 966 (United States v. Flanagan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related