United States v. Fjermestad

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Fjermestad

17 C.M.A. 287, 17 USCMA 287, 1967 CMA LEXIS 214

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedNovember 17, 1967

DocketNo. 20,393

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 17 C.M.A. 287 (United States v. Fjermestad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Fjermestad, 17 C.M.A. 287, 17 USCMA 287, 1967 CMA LEXIS 214 (cma 1967).

Pincite

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

The issue in this ease is whether the president of the special court-martial which tried the accused erred prej-udicially in failing to note that the inclusion of a bad-conduct discharge in the sentence was possible only because “the authorized confinement without substitution for such offenses is six months or more.” Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, paragraph 127c, section B. Our decision in United States v Yocom, 17 USCMA 270, 38 CMR 68, this day decided, governs the question.

The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The board may reassess the sentence or order a rehearing thereon.

Judge Kilday concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI