United States v. Fisher

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Fisher

30 F. App'x 176

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Fisher. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 F. App'x 662 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2002·No. 01-7502·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Percy Joe Fisher appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fisher Nos. CR-94-137; CA-96-905-4 (M.D.N.C. filed May 15, 2001 & entered May 16, 2001.) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal *177 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Percy Joe Fisher appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fisher Nos. CR-94-137; CA-96-905-4 (M.D.N.C. filed May 15, 2001 & entered May 16, 2001.) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal *177 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Fisher, 30 F. App'x 176 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

30 F. App'x 176 (United States v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related