United States v. Finney
This text of 439 F.2d 1116 (United States v. Finney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On appeal from a judgment of conviction for refusing induction into the Armed Services, appellant contends that his local board erred in failing to con-side his claim for I-A-0 status. The claim was presented to his local board after he had refused induction and after he was indicted for his refusal.
It is now well established that a local board is not required to take action concerning a request for a change in classification which is filed after the registrant has refused induction. United States v. Lowell, 437 F.2d 906 (9th Cir. 1971), and cases cited. This being true, the local board properly refused to reopen appellant’s classification.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 F.2d 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-finney-ca9-1971.