United States v. Finley Ray Curtis, and William Frank Small

416 F.2d 19
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 6, 1969
Docket13477
StatusPublished

This text of 416 F.2d 19 (United States v. Finley Ray Curtis, and William Frank Small) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Finley Ray Curtis, and William Frank Small, 416 F.2d 19 (4th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Finley Ray Curtis and William Frank Small were found guilty in the District Court of South Carolina, March 26, 1969, on one count of unlawfully concealing and retaining stolen postal money orders in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641, and on two counts of forging, and two counts of uttering, postal money orders in contravention of 18 U.S.C. § 500. On their appeal they attack the validity of the arrest, the search of their automobile, and the seizure of incriminating evidence therein. They likewise question the adequacy of the identification of Small, the admission of certain evidence, and the sufficiency of the proof to convict. On examining each of these assignments of error, we perceive no basis for the appeal and sustain defendants’ conviction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Money orders
18 U.S.C. § 500

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
416 F.2d 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-finley-ray-curtis-and-william-frank-small-ca4-1969.