United States v. Figueroa

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2010·No. 09-7729·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7729

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MEBLIN XIOMAR FIGUEROA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:05-cr-00024-nkm-1)

Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Meblin Xiomar Figueroa, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Meblin Xiomar Figueroa appeals the district court’s

orders denying his motion to compel the Government to file a

Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) substantial assistance motion and denying

his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Figueroa’s

motion for transcripts at government expense and affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Figueroa, No. 6:05-cr-00024-nkm-1 (W.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2009 &

Sept. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Figueroa, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Figueroa (United States v. Figueroa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.