United States v. Fields
Opinion
Derrick L. Fields appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and for possessing a stolen firearm. He argues that the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence of the firearm, which was seized pursuant to a search warrant. Because the affidavit supporting the search warrant was more than a “bare bones” affidavit, the officers who executed the warrant relied on it in good faith, and evidence of the firearm was *681 admissible. See United States v. Satterwhite, 980 F.2d 817, 320-21 (5th Cir.1992). AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
202 F. App'x 680 (United States v. Fields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.