United States v. Fields

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Fields. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 F. App'x 622
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2003·No. 02-50690·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 17, 2003

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 02-50690 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHERMAN LAMONT FIELDS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-01-CR-114-ALL --------------------

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Sherman Lamont Fields has

requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although he was

granted extensions of time to file a response to his counsel’s

motion, Fields has not filed a response. Our independent review

of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-50690 -2-

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal

is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Counsel’s motion to extend

the time for Fields to file an amended brief is DENIED.

ANDERS MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR APPELLANT TO FILE AN AMENDED BRIEF DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fields, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Fields (United States v. Fields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)