United States v. Fields
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 17, 2003
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 02-50690 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHERMAN LAMONT FIELDS,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-01-CR-114-ALL --------------------
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Sherman Lamont Fields has
requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although he was
granted extensions of time to file a response to his counsel’s
motion, Fields has not filed a response. Our independent review
of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue
for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-50690 -2-
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Counsel’s motion to extend
the time for Fields to file an amended brief is DENIED.
ANDERS MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR APPELLANT TO FILE AN AMENDED BRIEF DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Fields (United States v. Fields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.