United States v. Fields

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Fields. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 F.3d 1200
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 15, 1998·No. 97-30752·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30752 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALLEN JERRY FIELDS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CV-512 - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Allen Jerry Fields, Jr., federal prisoner #08388-035,

appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence. Fields

contends that the district court erred in dismissing his § 2255

motion as barred by the one-year statute of limitations set forth

in § 2255. Because Fields filed his § 2255 motion on March 10,

1997, or within a year of the effective date of the Antiterrorism

and Effective Death Penalty Act, Fields’ § 2255 motion was not

time-barred. United States v. Flores, 135 F.3d 1000, 1004-06

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-30752 -2-

(5th Cir. 1998). The district court’s judgment dismissing

Fields’ § 2255 motion on statute-of-limitations grounds is

VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fields, (5th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Fields (United States v. Fields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Romeo Trinidad Flores, Jr.
135 F.3d 1000 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)