United States v. Fields

399 F. App'x 821
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Fields. Read the opinion of the Court — 552 F.3d 401
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 28, 2010·No. 09-5151·Unpublished

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Edward Fields appeals the 188-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2006). We affirm.

On appeal, Fields challenges the district court’s consideration of a prior felony conviction when determining his career offender status and criminal history category. However, the sentencing court properly declined to address Fields’ challenge to the validity of a prior state felony conviction, as the federal sentencing proceeding was not the appropriate forum for such a challenge. See Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485, 496-97, 114 S.Ct. 1732, 128 L.Ed.2d 517 (1994); United States v. Dean, 604 F.3d 169, 174-75 (4th Cir.2010). Moreover, even if Fields succeeded in invalidating one prior state felony conviction, he had at least two other prior felony convictions qualifying him as a career offender under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1(a) (2007). United States v. Pettiford, 612 F.3d 270, 276-77 (4th Cir.2010). Furthermore, the court properly calculated Fields’ criminal history category at VI under USSG § 4Bl.l(b).

Accordingly, we affirm Fields’ sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fields, 399 F. App'x 821 (4th Cir. 2010).

399 F. App'x 821 (United States v. Fields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dean
604 F.3d 169 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Pettiford
612 F.3d 270 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)
Custis v. United States
511 U.S. 485 (Supreme Court, 1994)