United States v. Fields

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Fields

144 F. App'x 349

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Fields. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 F. App'x 148 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2005·No. 05-6635·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Donald Jerome Fields, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Fields’s motion requesting transcripts and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Fields, No. CR-00-405 (M.D.N.C. April 8, 2005). We grant Fields leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Donald Jerome Fields, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Fields’s motion requesting transcripts and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Fields, No. CR-00-405 (M.D.N.C. April 8, 2005). We grant Fields leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Fields, 144 F. App'x 349 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

144 F. App'x 349 (United States v. Fields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.