United States v. Ferro
This text of 126 F. Supp. 958 (United States v. Ferro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this wagering tax prosecution, defendant moves to dismiss on the ground that the purchase of the Special Tax Stamp within the month during which he commenced business is compliance with the Act, relying on Farmer v. U. S., 10 Cir., 1942, 128 F.2d 970.
The Farmer case, however, is a retail liquor dealer tax case, to which 26 U.S.C. § 3272, permitting payment by the end of the month of starting business is applicable.
26 U.S.C. § 3292, however, applies sections 3271, 3273(a), 3275, 3276, 3277, 3279 and 3280 to the Wagering Tax, but specifically provides that no other provision of subchapter B of chapter 27 (which includes section 3272) shall so extend or apply. In the absence of applicability -of section 3272, the provisions of 3271 plainly require purchase of the stamp before commencement of a wagering business.
The motion to dismiss the criminal information is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 F. Supp. 958, 46 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1832, 1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ferro-ctd-1954.