United States v. Ferris

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Ferris

399 F.2d 303

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 14, 1968

DocketNo. 22827

StatusPublished

This text of 399 F.2d 303 (United States v. Ferris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Ferris, 399 F.2d 303 (9th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Ferris, charged with bank robbery, apparently could have had a trial months ago, but he prefers to sit in jail in Sacramento and litigate about the amount of bond fixed: $10,000.

We find a solid basis in the record for the trial court’s determination. While Ferris is presumed to be innocent, he is charged with a very serious crime.

We suggest that the trial court proceed with the trial at the earliest practical date. We know the trial court is an exceedingly busy one, but the court’s business is not the reason for the delay here.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Ferris, charged with bank robbery, apparently could have had a trial months ago, but he prefers to sit in jail in Sacramento and litigate about the amount of bond fixed: $10,000.

We find a solid basis in the record for the trial court’s determination. While Ferris is presumed to be innocent, he is charged with a very serious crime.

We suggest that the trial court proceed with the trial at the earliest practical date. We know the trial court is an exceedingly busy one, but the court’s business is not the reason for the delay here.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

399 F.2d 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ferris-ca9-1968.