United States v. Ferris

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ferris. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 F.4th 235
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2023·No. 23-50006·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-50006 Document: 00516939426 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/20/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50006 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ October 20, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jonathan Jefferson Ferris,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:19-CR-288-1 ______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jonathan Jefferson Ferris has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ferris has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-50006 Document: 00516939426 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/20/2023

No. 23-50006

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ferris, (5th Cir. 2023).

United States v. Ferris (United States v. Ferris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)