United States v. Ferraris
This text of 324 F. App'x 114 (United States v. Ferraris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Defendant-Appellant Mark Ferraris challenges as unreasonable his sentence, which includes imprisonment for 36 months. He pled guilty to a charge of conspiracy to distribute at least 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. The District Court granted a downward departure from the Guidelines range of 87 to 109 months.
The claim that the sentence is unreasonable is entirely without merit. Also without merit is the claim that the sentencing judge failed to give adequate consideration to the relevant sentencing factors set out in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Verkhoglyad, 516 F.3d 122, 127, 129 (2d Cir.2008).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 F. App'x 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ferraris-ca2-2009.