United States v. Fernando Serna-Rivera

489 F. App'x 795
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 2012
Docket12-40572
StatusUnpublished

This text of 489 F. App'x 795 (United States v. Fernando Serna-Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fernando Serna-Rivera, 489 F. App'x 795 (5th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

*796 Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Fernando Sergio Serna-Rivera challenges his sentence on the ground that the district court engaged in double counting by using his prior drug-trafficking conviction to increase both his offense level and his criminal history score. Serna-Rivera raises the issue to preserve it for possible further review but concedes that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Calbat, 266 F.3d 358, 364 (5th Cir.2001), and United States v. Box, 50 F.3d 345, 359 (5th Cir.1995). See United States v. Duarte, 569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir.2009). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Calbat
266 F.3d 358 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Duarte
569 F.3d 528 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 F. App'x 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fernando-serna-rivera-ca5-2012.