United States v. Fernandez

425 F.3d 1248
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 19, 2005·No. Nos. 01-50082, 01-50088, 01-50126, 01-50162, 01-50373, 01-50513·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The following defendant-appellees have requested remands to the district court for it to consider modification of their sentences: Roy Gavaldon, David Gonzales-Contreras, and Dominick Shewmaker Gonzales.

Defendant-appellant Fernandez has responded that he does not want a remand for resentencing. His sentence stands affirmed.

The affirmance of Defendant-appellant Schoenberg Sanchez’s sentence stands.

The reversal of Defendant-appellant Sanchez’s sentence stands; the mandate has issued in his case.

In our opinion we vacated the sentences of David Gonzales-Contreras and Dominick Shewmaker Gonzales. We amend our opinion to this extent: We remand to the district court to consider whether to resen-tence, but do not vacate their sentences.

We remand Roy Gavaldon’s sentence to the district court to consider whether to resentence.

The mandate shall issue forthwith on the opinion 388 F.3d 1199 (9th Cir.2004) as modified by this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fernandez, 425 F.3d 1248 (9th Cir. 2005).

425 F.3d 1248 (United States v. Fernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related