United States v. Fernandez
This text of United States v. Fernandez (United States v. Fernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 24-20511 Document: 44-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 24-20511 FILED May 12, 2025 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Alexander Ruben Fernandez,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21-CR-258-1 ______________________________
Before Graves, Willett, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Alexander Ruben Fernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Fernandez has filed a response incorporating a motion for appointment of new counsel. The record is not sufficiently developed to
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-20511 Document: 44-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/12/2025
No. 24-20511
allow us to make a fair evaluation of Fernandez’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Fernandez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Fernandez’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Fernandez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fernandez-ca5-2025.