United States v. Fermin Jaimes-Enriquez

360 F. App'x 702
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 12, 2010·No. 09-2211·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Fermín Jaimes-Enriquez appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence imposed by the district court 1 upon his guilty plea to illegally re-entering the United States after having been deported following an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. *703 § 1326(a), (b)(2). On appeal, his counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence was unreasonable.

Having carefully reviewed the record and the sentence, see United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir.2009) (en banc) (deferential abuse-of-discretion standard of review), we conclude that the sentence is not unreasonable, see Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 347-50, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007) (presumption of reasonableness); United States v. Cadenas, 445 F.3d 1091, 1094 (8th Cir.2006). Further, following our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fermin Jaimes-Enriquez, 360 F. App'x 702 (8th Cir. 2010).

360 F. App'x 702 (United States v. Fermin Jaimes-Enriquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Rita v. United States
551 U.S. 338 (Supreme Court, 2007)
United States v. Feemster
572 F.3d 455 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)