United States v. Ferguson

59 F. App'x 942
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2003·No. No. 02-30117; D.C. No. CR-00-00192-JCC·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Stephen Clifford Ferguson appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U. S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the supposed new evidence would not probably lead to an acquittal because it did not affect Ferguson’s lack of standing to challenge the search of his house. See United States v. Kulczyk, 931 F.2d 542, 548-49 (9th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Ferguson’s Rule 33 motion.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ferguson, 59 F. App'x 942 (9th Cir. 2003).

59 F. App'x 942 (United States v. Ferguson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Lewis R. Kulczyk
931 F.2d 542 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)