United States v. Ferguson
This text of 59 F. App'x 942 (United States v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Stephen Clifford Ferguson appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U. S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the supposed new evidence would not probably lead to an acquittal because it did not affect Ferguson’s lack of standing to challenge the search of his house. See United States v. Kulczyk, 931 F.2d 542, 548-49 (9th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Ferguson’s Rule 33 motion.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 F. App'x 942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ferguson-ca9-2003.