United States v. Ferguson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ferguson. Read the opinion of the Court — 211 F.3d 878
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2001·No. 00-21142·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-21142 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DENNIS FERGUSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-67-ALL - - - - - - - - - - August 2, 2001

Before DEMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dennis

Ferguson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ferguson

has filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review

of the brief, the record, and Ferguson’s response discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ferguson, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Ferguson (United States v. Ferguson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)