United States v. Ferguson

307 F. App'x 757
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ferguson. Read the opinion of the Court — 245 F. App'x 233
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2009·No. No. 08-8319·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Ferguson appeals the district court order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 33 motion for a new tidal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Ferguson filed his motion for a new trial over four years after the jury returned its guilty verdict and more than three years after the judgment of conviction was entered. A motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence must be filed within three years after the finding of guilt. Ferguson exceeded the time limit provided by Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. Therefore, the district court properly denied the motion.

Accordingly, we affirm for the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ferguson, 307 F. App'x 757 (4th Cir. 2009).

307 F. App'x 757 (United States v. Ferguson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.