United States v. Ferguson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6553

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

COLUMBUS FERGUSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-268-P, CA-97-33-3-P)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Columbus Ferguson, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Columbus Ferguson appeals the district court’s order denying

his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Ferguson,

Nos. CR-92-268-P; CA-97-33-3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 1999). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED