United States v. Felix-Ramirez
This text of 165 F. App'x 513 (United States v. Felix-Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jorge Felix-Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawful reentry of a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Felix-Ramirez contends that his sentence in excess of two years, based on a sentencing enhancement under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) for a prior drug trafficking conviction, is illegal and violated his Sixth Amendment rights under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). As Felix-Ramirez acknowledges, his contention has been rejected by this court. See United States v. Quintana-Quintana, 383 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir.2004).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 F. App'x 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-felix-ramirez-ca9-2006.