United States v. Felix Herrera, Jr.

256 F. App'x 24
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 29, 2007·No. 06-1742·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Felix Herrera, Jr., challenges the district court’s 1 order denying his “Motion for Reduction of Sentence (Rule 35).” We construe the motion as a motion to correct Herrera’s sentence filed under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(a). Cf. Fed.R.CrimP. 35(b) (upon government’s motion within 1 year of sentencing, court may reduce sentence for defendant’s substantial assistance). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, as the sentence did not result “from arithmetical, technical, or other clear error.” See Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a); United States v. Peltier, 446 F.3d 911, 913 (8th Cir.2006) (standard of review).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Felix Herrera, Jr., 256 F. App'x 24 (8th Cir. 2007).

256 F. App'x 24 (United States v. Felix Herrera, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Leonard Peltier
446 F.3d 911 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)