United States v. Felix D. Diaz, A/K/A Papo

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Felix D. Diaz, A/K/A Papo

48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11064, 1995 WL 91302

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 7, 1995

Docket94-7081

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1217 (United States v. Felix D. Diaz, A/K/A Papo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Felix D. Diaz, A/K/A Papo, 48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11064, 1995 WL 91302 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Felix D. DIAZ, a/k/a Papo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-7081.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 28, 1995.
Decided March 7, 1995.

Felix D. Diaz, Appellant Pro Se.

David Scott Lavine, Perry Scott Bechky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Diaz, Nos. CR-91-322-A and CA-94-519 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Felix D. DIAZ, a/k/a Papo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-7081.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 28, 1995.
Decided March 7, 1995.

Felix D. Diaz, Appellant Pro Se.

David Scott Lavine, Perry Scott Bechky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Diaz, Nos. CR-91-322-A and CA-94-519 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11064, 1995 WL 91302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-felix-d-diaz-aka-papo-ca4-1995.