United States v. Felicitas Sanchez-De Toscano

103 F.3d 143, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35952, 1996 WL 711456
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 5, 1996
Docket95-50403
StatusUnpublished

This text of 103 F.3d 143 (United States v. Felicitas Sanchez-De Toscano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Felicitas Sanchez-De Toscano, 103 F.3d 143, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35952, 1996 WL 711456 (9th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

103 F.3d 143

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Felicitas SANCHEZ-DE TOSCANO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-50403.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 2, 1996.*
Decided Dec. 5, 1996.

Before: SNEED, TROTT and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Felicitas Sanchez-De Toscano appeals her sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for her guilty plea conviction to transportation of illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii). Sanchez contends that the district court erred by "departing upward" from the 24 month custody recommendation of the government and the presentence report. The district court, however, did not "depart upward," but rather sentenced Sanchez within the applicable guideline range of 27 to 33 months, which was based on a higher Criminal History Category than that contemplated by the parties in the plea agreement. Sanchez did not object to the Category, and we have no jurisdiction to review the district court's choice of sentence within the guideline range. United States v. Pelayo-Bautista, 907 F.2d 99, 101 (9th Cir.1990). Accordingly, Sanchez's appeal is

DISMISSED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 F.3d 143, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35952, 1996 WL 711456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-felicitas-sanchez-de-toscano-ca9-1996.