United States v. FEIST
This text of United States v. FEIST (United States v. FEIST) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before DALY, GROSS, and de GROOT Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Dylan M. FEIST Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 202400289
Decided: 27 February 2024
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judges: Derek A. Poteet (arraignment) Matthew M. Harris (trial)
Sentence adjudged 29 March 2024 by a general court-martial tried at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement for 24 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and a dishonorable dis- charge. 1
For Appellant: Lieutenant Benjamin M. Cook, JAGC, USN
1 Appellant was credited with having served 27 days of pretrial confinement. United States v. Feist, NMCCA No. 202400289 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court
2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. FEIST, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-feist-nmcca-2025.