United States v. Fecther

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Fecther

143 F. App'x 296

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedSeptember 15, 2005

DocketNo. 05-11282; D.C. Docket No. 04-00097-CR-3-LAC

StatusPublished

This text of 143 F. App'x 296 (United States v. Fecther) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Fecther, 143 F. App'x 296 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Court-appointed counsel for Richard Anthony Fechter seeks to withdraw on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination reveals no arguable issues of merit on which to base an appeal, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fechter’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Court-appointed counsel for Richard Anthony Fechter seeks to withdraw on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination reveals no arguable issues of merit on which to base an appeal, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fechter’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 F. App'x 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fecther-ca11-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack