United States v. Fausto
107 S. Ct. 1344, 480 U.S. 904, 94 L. Ed. 2d 516, 55 U.S.L.W. 3586, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 963
Opinion
The motion of respondent to amend the question presented is denied. The motion of respondent to file a brief pro se is granted. The motion of respondent to present oral argument pro se is denied. John M. Nannes, Esquire, of Washington, D.C., a member of the Bar of this Court, is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Fausto, 107 S. Ct. 1344, 480 U.S. 904, 94 L. Ed. 2d 516, 55 U.S.L.W. 3586, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 963 (U.S. 1987).
107 S. Ct. 1344 (United States v. Fausto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Providence Journal Co.
485 U.S. 693 (Supreme Court, 1988)